Substantive-adjectival form of representation of Vladimir Monomah’s descendants in Kyiv chronicle

Authors

  • Hanna Mezhzherina National Aviation University, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/um/46(2016).22-39

Keywords:

noun, adjective, socio-ethical portrait, Kyiv chronicle, Vladimir Monomah’s descendants.

Abstract

The article touches upon detection of nouns and adjectives that simulate the socio-ethical portraits of Vladimir Monomah’s descendants in Kyiv chronicle ХІІ century. The semantic peculiarities and stylistic functions of these lexemes have been disclosed. It is proved that there is a clear pattern in using of laudatory epithets-definitions (братолюбьць, благовhрьныи, благонравьнъ, христолюбивыи etc.) next to the names of Vladimir Monomah’s grandsons and great-grandsons.

 

 

Information about the author:

Hanna Mezhzherina – Dr Hab, Prof. of the Department of Philology and Natural Sciences, National Aviation University (Ukraine).

E-mail: 2802korchuk@ukr.net

References
  1. Vojtovych L.V. (2006) Knyazha doba na Rusi: Portrety elity [Princely epoch in Russia: Portrait of the elite]. Bila Cerkva: Vyd. O.V. Pshonkivskyj, 784 p. (in Ukrainian).
  2. Kolesov V.V. (2004) Slovo i delo: Iz istorii russkikh slov [Word and deed: From the history of Russian words]. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 703 p. (in Russian).
  3. Kotlyar M.F. (2011) Duxovnyj svit litopysannya [The spiritual world of chronicle writing]. Kyiv: Instytut istoriyi Ukrayiny NAN Ukrayiny, 338 p. (in Ukrainian).
  4. Litvina A.F., Uspenskiy F. B. (2004) Glava iz istorii vybora imen u Ryurikovichey: knyazya tezki i ikh patronalnye svyatye [Chapter from History of the choice of Rurik’s names: princes namesake and patron saints]. Questions of onomastics, no. 1, pp. 14-32 (in Russian).
  5. Mezhzherina G.V. (2014) Substantyvno-adyektyvnyj dyskurs konceptua- lizaciyi obrazu knyazya Andriya Bogolyubskogo v litopysax Kyyivskoyi Rusi [The substantive-adjectival dicours of the conceptualization of Grand Duke Andryi Bogolubskyi in Kyiv Rus’ chronicles]. Comparative study of Slavic Languages and Literatures: In memory of academician Leonid Bulakhovskyj. Kyiv, no. 24, pp. 104-117 (in Ukrainian).
  6. Pryzhov I.G. (1862) Nishchie na svyatoy Rusi: Materialy dlya istorii obshchestvennogo i narodnogo byta v Rossii [Paupers in Holy Russia Materials for the history of social and folk life in Russia]. Moscow: Tipografiya M.I. Smirnovoy, 139 p. (in Russian).
  7. Tolochko A.P. (1992) Knyaz v Drevney Rusi: vlast, sobstvennost, ideologiya [Grand Duke in ancient Russia: power, property, ideology]. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 224 p. (in Russian).

Published

2016-09-09

Issue

Section

HISTORY OF LANGUAGE

How to Cite

Mezhzherina, H. (2016). Substantive-adjectival form of representation of Vladimir Monomah’s descendants in Kyiv chronicle. Ukrainian Linguistics, 1(46), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.17721/um/46(2016).22-39