The cognitive aspects of metonymy

Authors

  • Оlena Hapchenko Ph D, Doc. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/um/46(2016).53-65

Keywords:

semantic, meaning, cognitive linguistics, metaphor

Abstract

The subject of the study is the metonymy understood as a linguistic phenomenon and cognitive process. The meaning of the word regarded as a reflection of social and cultural reality. We review the history of the approach to the metonymy in the works of R. Jacobson, Z. Kovecses, G.  Lakoff, R. W. Langacker, G. Radden, J. Taylor et al.

 

Information about the author:

Olena Gapchenko – PhD, Associate Prof. of the Department of the Modern Ukrainian Language, Institute of Philology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Ukraine).

E-mail: olenagapchenko@ukr.net

__________ References
  1. Krongauz M.A. (2001) Semantika [Semantics]. Moskva: Ros. gos. gumanit. un-t, 399 p. (in Russian).
  2. Lakoff G., Johnson M. (2008) Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. Moskva : Izdatelstvo LKI, 256 р. (in Russian).
  3. Ortega-i-Gasset H. (1990) Dve Velikie metafory [Two great metaphors]. Arutyunova N. D, Zhurinskoy M. A. (eds.). Teorija metafory [The theory of meta- phor]. Moskva: Progress, pp. 68-81 (in Russian).
  4. Richards A.A. (1990) Filosofija ritoriki [Philosophy of rhetoric]. Arutyunova N. D, Zhurinskoy M.A. (eds.). Teorija metafory [The theory of metaphor]. Moskva: Pro- gress, pp. 44-67 (in Russian).
  5. Rjabceva N.K. (2005) Jazyk i estestvennyj intellekt [Language and natural intelligence]. Moskva : Academia, 640 p. (in Russian).
  6. Shmelev D.N. (1977) Sovremennyj russkij jazyk: Leksika [Modern Russian language: Vocabulary]. Moskva: Prosveschenie, 335 p. (in Russian).
  7. Jaсobson R. (1990) Dva aspekta jazyka i dva tipa afaticheskih narushenij [Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disorders]. Arutyunova N.D, Zhurinskoy M.A. (eds.). Teorija metafory [The theory of metaphor]. Moskva: Pro- gress, pp. 110-132 (in Russian).
  8. Dirven R. (1999) Conversion as a Conceptual Metonymy of Event Schemata. Panther K.-U., Radden G. (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, рр. 275-288.
  9. Jäkel O. (1999) Metonymy in Onomastics. Panther K.-U., Radden G. (eds.). Me- tonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub- lishing Company, рр. 211-232.
  10. Lakoff G. (1993) The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought. Ed. by A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, рр. 202-251.
  11. Langacker R. W. (1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 4, No 1, рр. 1-38.
  12. Radden G., Kövecses Z. (1999) Towards a Theory of Metonymy. Panther K.-U., Radden G. (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, рр. 17-59.
  13. Warren B. (1999) Aspects of Referential Metonymy. Panther K.-U., Radden G. (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, рр. 121-138.

References

Published

2016-09-09

Issue

Section

COGNITIVE SEMANTICS

How to Cite

Hapchenko О. (2016). The cognitive aspects of metonymy. Ukrainian Linguistics, 1(46), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.17721/um/46(2016).53-65