Lingual Aspects of Mystical Narration in V. Shevchuk’s Novel “The Beginning of Horror”

Abstract

In recent decades, the researchers of artistic stories have paid their attention to the narrative analysis of a set of weird texts of mystical and absurd content, works of “black humour”, fantastic (khymerna) prose created by a non-anthropic narrator or by an author in a changed state of consciousness. These texts serve the field of actualizing atypical and non-usual narrative structures, the sphere of meaningful changes within the bounds of narrative categories and, which is important, of forming special communicative senses of aesthetic nature. The basic problems of the linguistic analysis of “unnatural” stories are identifying the types of changes in the narration constituents, reasons of these changes and narrative categories (first of all, events, participants, objects, chronotope characteristics, points of view, moduses, modalities, etc.). The article analyses one of the texts of mystical content aiming at the revealing of some specificities of the structure and functioning of the so-called “unnatural artistic narrations”. The object of the research is V. Shevchuk’s novel “The Beginning of Horror”. The subject of the analysis is lingual means of the narrative structure formation, the author’s objectification of the mystical artistic sense and lingual “signals” of a reader’s perception of these senses. The most important semantic means of creating mystical atmosphere of the story are predicates that ascribe the names of their referents atypical dynamic and static features connected with the Christian view of the infernal world. It helps to form narrative events that root in weird situations, which cannot take place in reality. Non-dispositional nature of these situations correlates with the reference to the mystery that goes far beyond the bounds of a usual perceptive and psycho-mental background. Among the pragmatic means of creating mystical atmosphere of the main hero’s story as well as of the novel in general, we specify the individual inimitative perception of the flow of time and modality of “real unreality” formed by the role of an unreliable narrator and a vague point of view of the described event with its perceptive, ideological and time planes of objectification. Due to the increasing interest to various expressions of the esoteric, the increase of the number of artistic works of such content and growth of their popularity, we consider it topical to proceed in further investigations of lingual-narrative aspects of “unnatural” stories, in particular, the ones with the modus of mystical in them.

Information about the author:

Florij Batsevych – Dr Hab, Prof., Ivan Franko Lviv National University (Ukraine).

E-mail: florij@in.lviv.ua

__________

References

1. Baryshnikova D. (2013). Cognitive Turn in Post-Classical Narratology (Review of new books in English). NLO, no. 119, pp. 309-319 (in Russian).
2. Bacevych F. (2011). Mystical Texts as a Linguistic Problem. Visnyk L`vivs`kogo universytetu. Seriya filologichna, no. 52, pp. 171-184 (in Ukrainian).
3. Mikirtumov B. (2004). Lexis of Psychopathology. Sankt-Peterburg: Rech, 200 p. (in Russian).
4. Stepanchuk Ju. (2003). Problem of a Mystical Text. Interpretation and Inexplicability. URL: http://www.humanities.edu.ru/db/msg/46547 (in Russian).
5. Tolle E. (2018). The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment. L`viv: Vydavnycztvo Terra Incognita, 224 p. (in Ukrainian).
6. Shevchuk V. (2011). The Beginning of Horror. Kyiv: A-BA-BA-GA-LA-MA-GA, pp. 203-300 (in Ukrainian).
7. Shmid V. (2008). Narratologija. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury, 304 p. (in Russian).
8. Alber J. (2009). Impossible Storyworlds – and What to Do with Them. A Journal of Narrative Studies, no. 1. pp. 79-96.
9. Alber J, Iversen S., Nielsen H.S., Richardson B. (2010). Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology: Beyond Mimetic Models. Narrative, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 113-136.
10. Labov W., Waledzky J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, pp. 12-44 (in English). 
11. Nűnning A. (2003). Narratology or Narratologies? Taking Stock of recent Developments, Critique and Modest Proposals for Future Usages of the Term. What is Narratology? Questions and Answers Regarding the Status of a Theory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 239-275 (in English).
12. Igl N., Zeman S. (eds.) (2016). Perspectives on Narrativity and Narrative Perspectivization. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 185 p.13.
13. Richardson B.(2006). Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus, 246 р.